> IP is not property, and empirical evindence shows they do more harm then good for humanity. Although I agree with your position re IP not legitimately being

> IP is not property, and empirical evindence shows they do more harm then good for humanity. Although I agree with your position re IP not legitimately being property, I want to nitpick a bit here, and point out that empirical evidence can only substantiate empirical claims. Construing outcomes as "harm" or "good" is a normative evaluation, so this argument is an attempt to leap across the is-ought gap.