> If we could reduce any of it for the same performance we would. Nope, because all of them are harder than just going bigger. > Top model performance is an a

> If we could reduce any of it for the same performance we would. Nope, because all of them are harder than just going bigger. > Top model performance is an arms race and it's happening at every expense. This is also what I said. "Growth (in model performance) is king, so quick and dirty (going bigger) beating harder optimization efforts". > This is very different than a program that... [Snipped for brevity] Again this is what I said by "it keeps development momentum". Yes people have different priorities. Mostly money and fame in this point. So, we don't disagree a bit.