7 ms·
I think that the disclaimer should be the other way around. It should be assumed that the message comes from the person you are talking to. Nonetheless I've be
by nicbou 3y ago
I think that the disclaimer should be the other way around. It should be assumed that the message comes from the person you are talking to.
Nonetheless I've been tempted to add an "AI-free" or "written by a human" logo on my website. There just isn't a place where it would make any sense.
- fragmede 3y agoAs I see it, the three places would be your header or footer, or on your about page. I see it as the same as a disclaimer that a post is using affiliate links. So maybe also as optional text on a particularly long form piece of text. Eg this comment of mine isn't long enough to warrant a disclaimer (though I did not use ChatGPT), but for something more longwinded, a maybe we're at a place we're a disclaimer makes sense. Maybe just pick one and feel it out. The disclaimer/disclosure good both ways though, I think. Telling people AI was used in the generation of the post cheapens it for anti-AI purists, but not everyone thinks that way. I personally am okay reading AI generated text, since I chat with ChatGPT on my own projects and for my own knowledge already, so I don't see why it would be so different encountering it in the wild, so to speak. Okay, and now I've written enough that it turns out I feel like adding a disclaimer: this comment written by a human, with no help from an AI.
- fragmede 3y agothen again, if I start saying no ChatGPT was used on a post in other contexts, then the implication is that I'm using ChatGPT when I don't give a disclaimer, which is not where I want to be.
- politelemon 3y agohttps://notbyai.fyi/ https://notbyai.fyi/ don't know if that's the one you meant
- nicbou 3y agoI'm pretty sure that's the one. Thanks!