3 ms·

With the current abysmal cultural trends around "AI"-based cheating and shirking... Maybe we're going to need a way for people to signal "If you send LLM-gener

by neilv 3y ago

With the current abysmal cultural trends around "AI"-based cheating and shirking... Maybe we're going to need a way for people to signal "If you send LLM-generated text to me under the pretext that you wrote it, I will (depending on context) urge that you be sanctioned by the academic/professional organization, refer you to academic discipline committee for suspension or expulsion, have you put on a PIP or fired, or downrate your friendship level."

ben_w 3y ago
I'm sure a lot of people are already doing that. I doubt this response will ever become dominant, in part because the tool is already really useful despite its limitations. I'm not sure how it's going to shake out, given the tools are not likely to be static.
pylua 3y ago
Sent from my aiphone.
fragmede 3y ago
Disclaimer: No ChatGPT was used for this post. What if people used a disclaimer to actively signal, ChatGPT was used for the English here, at the top/bottom of emails/whatever when it was used. would it be as much of a problem for you then?
- nicbou 3y ago
  I think that the disclaimer should be the other way around. It should be assumed that the message comes from the person you are talking to. Nonetheless I've been tempted to add an "AI-free" or "written by a human" logo on my website. There just isn't a place where it would make any sense.
  - fragmede 3y ago
    As I see it, the three places would be your header or footer, or on your about page. I see it as the same as a disclaimer that a post is using affiliate links. So maybe also as optional text on a particularly long form piece of text. Eg this comment of mine isn't long enough to warrant a disclaimer (though I did not use ChatGPT), but for something more longwinded, a maybe we're at a place we're a disclaimer makes sense. Maybe just pick one and feel it out. The disclaimer/disclosure good both ways though, I think. Telling people AI was used in the generation of the post cheapens it for anti-AI purists, but not everyone thinks that way. I personally am okay reading AI generated text, since I chat with ChatGPT on my own projects and for my own knowledge already, so I don't see why it would be so different encountering it in the wild, so to speak. Okay, and now I've written enough that it turns out I feel like adding a disclaimer: this comment written by a human, with no help from an AI.
    - fragmede 3y ago
      then again, if I start saying no ChatGPT was used on a post in other contexts, then the implication is that I'm using ChatGPT when I don't give a disclaimer, which is not where I want to be.
  - politelemon 3y ago
    https://notbyai.fyi/ https://notbyai.fyi/ don't know if that's the one you meant
    - nicbou 3y ago
      I'm pretty sure that's the one. Thanks!
devwastaken 3y ago
Did you just write an LLM generated comment? I will refer you to the disciplinary committee that my cousin also happens to be on. /s

by neilv 3y ago

ben_w 3y ago

I'm sure a lot of people are already doing that. I doubt this response will ever become dominant, in part because the tool is already really useful despite its limitations. I'm not sure how it's going to shake out, given the tools are not likely to be static.

pylua 3y ago

Sent from my aiphone.

fragmede 3y ago

Disclaimer: No ChatGPT was used for this post. What if people used a disclaimer to actively signal, ChatGPT was used for the English here, at the top/bottom of emails/whatever when it was used. would it be as much of a problem for you then?

nicbou 3y ago
I think that the disclaimer should be the other way around. It should be assumed that the message comes from the person you are talking to. Nonetheless I've been tempted to add an "AI-free" or "written by a human" logo on my website. There just isn't a place where it would make any sense.
- fragmede 3y ago
  As I see it, the three places would be your header or footer, or on your about page. I see it as the same as a disclaimer that a post is using affiliate links. So maybe also as optional text on a particularly long form piece of text. Eg this comment of mine isn't long enough to warrant a disclaimer (though I did not use ChatGPT), but for something more longwinded, a maybe we're at a place we're a disclaimer makes sense. Maybe just pick one and feel it out. The disclaimer/disclosure good both ways though, I think. Telling people AI was used in the generation of the post cheapens it for anti-AI purists, but not everyone thinks that way. I personally am okay reading AI generated text, since I chat with ChatGPT on my own projects and for my own knowledge already, so I don't see why it would be so different encountering it in the wild, so to speak. Okay, and now I've written enough that it turns out I feel like adding a disclaimer: this comment written by a human, with no help from an AI.
  - fragmede 3y ago
    then again, if I start saying no ChatGPT was used on a post in other contexts, then the implication is that I'm using ChatGPT when I don't give a disclaimer, which is not where I want to be.
- politelemon 3y ago
  https://notbyai.fyi/ https://notbyai.fyi/ don't know if that's the one you meant
  - nicbou 3y ago
    I'm pretty sure that's the one. Thanks!

devwastaken 3y ago

Did you just write an LLM generated comment? I will refer you to the disciplinary committee that my cousin also happens to be on. /s