4 ms·
Not true. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13166/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13166/attachment
by ars 3y ago
Not true. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13166/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13166/attachments/1/...
And https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/ez_import/Asbestos_derogation_chrysotile_diaphragms.pdf https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/ez_import/Asbestos_...
- rsynnott 3y agoDid you read that document? It relates to a _single_ authorised usecase (electrolysis diaphragms used in chlorine production), plus some national laws which allow second-hand sale of existing things (generally buildings and old cars) which contain asbestos. It amounts to a ban.
- ars 3y agoYes I read it. The context is comparing the US and the EU. And this document shows they are substantially the same.