> admitting they have been / are hosting a large number of domains used for fraud and abuse Only if the abuse happened through them. Perhaps they were just hos

> admitting they have been / are hosting a large number of domains used for fraud and abuse Only if the abuse happened through them. Perhaps they were just hosting holding pages, and the traffic was pushed elsewhere when active scams were running? > surprises me, given the time and effort they spend mitigating fraud and abuse They mitigate it incoming as one of their features for their customers. That doesn't mean they are going to mitigate it outgoing quite as fiercely. Though I'd assume they'd made some effort at least to maintain a reasonable reputation for their IP ranges.