I think this is a good analogy and I agree that the intent of the law was not to force websites to have a cookie banner, it was just the side effect. What I th

I think this is a good analogy and I agree that the intent of the law was not to force websites to have a cookie banner, it was just the side effect. What I think we are missing is a browser option/API that lets the user choose the acceptable tracking level. Similar to the do not track header but more fine grained. As we are missing that, extensions are doing a good job ATM https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/consent-o-matic/mdjildafknihdffpkfmmpnpoiajfjnjd?pli=1 https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/consent-o-matic/mdj... https://addons.mozilla.org/ro/firefox/addon/consent-o-matic/ https://addons.mozilla.org/ro/firefox/addon/consent-o-matic/ I found pretty late about Consent-o matic and it saved me a ton of time handling banners. It's exactly what we should have built-in the browser.