I have a bigger problem with "up to": this means it's at most that much faster, but is probably not even such an improvement to begin with. I understand this is

I have a bigger problem with "up to": this means it's at most that much faster, but is probably not even such an improvement to begin with. I understand this is marketing, but it'd be great if they shared what's the average improvement they've seen in their customers' workloads (a random sample of). Making something twice as fast is great IMO, and as a firm believer in iterative improvements, I'd never knock it. Eg. if setting up a stack goes from 100s to 60s, that's a marked improvement.