I don't get it. If at some point, an employer only needs your avatar (AI-powered or not), one does not need you at all: automation took the position already.

I don't get it. If at some point, an employer only needs your avatar (AI-powered or not), one does not need you at all: automation took the position already. If _you_ need/use a ("clever") avatar of yourself to deduplicate your "performance" (because it's actually not yet a performance at this point) in more meetings, you will be outspent by your avatars engagements, whatever they are. If the point is to get sort of real time consultations/conversations about each other participants knowledge/skills/etc., through their avatars instead of their real selves, the exchange will have only happened between programs, not between people, so... who would decide what, act on what, and report on what then? with what consequences?