3 ms·
That no fatalities bit is the crucial part. And for quality of life the amount of noise is just much better for bikes, which if you live somewhere with roads an
by EraYaN 3y ago
That no fatalities bit is the crucial part. And for quality of life the amount of noise is just much better for bikes, which if you live somewhere with roads and bicycle lanes, you'd love for all the cars to go away and just have bicycles. You just need separates infrastructure, as a pedestrian you should almost never have to share a space with bicycles (or cars for that matter). And if you are on a shared space any sane design will make all cars and bicycles wait and slow down. And at that point they can't be annoying cause you don't have to go out of the way for them ever, they can wait (and seethe I suppose).
- Retric 3y ago> as a pedestrian you should almost never have to share a space with bicycles These collisions are mostly at intersections, which aren't avoidable on a flat surface you would need to go 3D. I'm in favor of raised sidewalks for pedestrians, but they are relatively pricey infrastructure. Edit: > That no fatalities bit is the crucial part. Globally I think the rates are quite a bit lower. But in the US it's closer than it might seem based on how many more drivers there are than cyclists. Cyclist only kill about 4 pedestrians per year in the US, but cyclists are also vastly less common especially on a per mile basis. https://www.nationalworld.com/news/politics/pedestrians-killed-dangerous-cyclists-road-deaths-3812845 https://www.nationalworld.com/news/politics/pedestrians-kill... To be clear I don't this says as much about bikes as it does the biased population of people currently using them.
- latortuga 3y agoIf we are comparing against cars though this is a no brainer. Cars and trucks are extremely hard on infrastructure while people and bikes are basically free. Go 3D!