4 ms·
So they choose to lose all the money instead some? Is that really in best interest of their stock holders?
by Ekaros 3y ago
So they choose to lose all the money instead some? Is that really in best interest of their stock holders?
- brodouevencode 3y agoWhen it comes to market viability there will come a time at which companies just pull out because the headache is too much, even if they are somewhat profitable. FWIW I think this is posturing on Uber/Lyft's behalf, but is almost certainly a sign of future actions if they cannot make the number work.
- Jensson 3y agoThey would have to invent a new business model to operate with an hourly minimum wage. Currently they demand very little of their drivers since they don't have to pay when the driver doesn't have a client, but add an hourly minimum wage and now they have to manage drivers a lot more to ensure they are worth that pay per hour. Now they will get replaced by more traditionally run taxi companies that managers their drivers tighter. Edit: Or no, the law explicitly said how much ride shares should pay per mile and per minute riding. So scratch that, not sure why they pulled out here.