> This path of destruction is so blindingly obvious, it's incredible that everyone is still working on AI instead of trying to destroy it. Obvious but also ine

> This path of destruction is so blindingly obvious, it's incredible that everyone is still working on AI instead of trying to destroy it. Obvious but also inevitable. Most of the discussions in this topic are short-sighted. We should look from a broader time perspective of human history. We're about to close the first quarter of 21th century with some initial advancements in AI. The second quarter will be all about transformation of the industries with the very possible introduction of AGI/ASI. This means the second half of the century must be a totally different world. With a totally different set of social constructs and different definitions for job, work, economy etc. I don't think we (humans, governments) are capable of changing the course of the history at the moment. We can only be cautious about the consequences.