>But Bloomberg doubling down on the story in 2021 strongly discounts the possibility that the original reporting was based on any kind of bad info. How so? If

>But Bloomberg doubling down on the story in 2021 strongly discounts the possibility that the original reporting was based on any kind of bad info. How so? If there was an ulterior motive (I don't know if there was, but it's been suggested) then they'd also double down. They also didn't even attempt to respond to the issues. If they had good information based in reality, a lot of the claims would've been trivial to refute.