> While his analysis concludes his hybrid tired light theory can play nicely with certain features of the Universe's residual echoes of light and sound, it does

> While his analysis concludes his hybrid tired light theory can play nicely with certain features of the Universe's residual echoes of light and sound, it does so only if we also ditch the idea that dark matter is also a thing. Is it the journal or the researcher (or me) being obtuse here? A new theory can not just ignore observations of localized structure such as galaxy rotation speeds (and be taken seriously). If dark matter is removed, the theory must account for why galaxies rotate faster than merely their visible matter allows.