3 ms·
Maybe the Oracle blog post [1] would be a better link than the Apple Insider article, which says "The problem does not affect most typical Mac users, as Java wa
by Symbiote 3y ago
Maybe the Oracle blog post [1] would be a better link than the Apple Insider article, which says "The problem does not affect most typical Mac users, as Java was deprecated for the Mac back in 2012."
[1] https://blogs.oracle.com/java/post/java-on-macos-14-4 https://blogs.oracle.com/java/post/java-on-macos-14-4
- mikiobraun 3y agoYeah, but all developers who are working with Java or JVM related languages or using JVM based tools like jetbrain's IDEs are affected. That's not "typical" but still many people.
- cataphract 3y agoI think they're confusing the Java plugin for websites with the normal Java runtime.
- mort96 3y agoI can't find that quote in your link. I can't find any mention of the word "deprecated" or "2012". Did you send the wrong link?
- Symbiote 3y agoMy quote is from the 5th paragraph of the posted article. I suggest the Oracle blog as an alternative. I thought it was clear, but I have replaced the "this" in my comment anyway.
- mort96 3y agoAha, sorry, I totally misunderstood the meaning of your comment. In that case, I 100% agree with you, the Oracle article seems much better than the Apple Insider article.