3 ms·

do you disagree with all laws or just ones meant to protect workers' wages?

• abigail95 3y ago
  if ride sharing didn't exist wages would be lower. companies like uber increase wages, see Seattle's law reducing the pay of drivers by enforcing minimums. those laws do not protect wages, uber was right to protest them.
• protocolture 3y ago
  Just the ones designed to protect cabcharges monopoly.
• lannisterstark 3y ago
  Giving certain monopolies complete control over the industry and not letting competition in which drives down the prices for consumers is anything but "protecting workers' wages." You don't work if you are getting 0 rides because they're too expensive for end-user. What wages?
• johngladtj 3y ago
  All the ones that restrict freedom without good reason
• mianos 3y ago
  The taxi laws didn't end up protecting the wages of the drivers. They ended up protecting the rights of the 'plate owners', who, having too much cash, used taxi plates as an investment and rented out the taxis to drivers on a nightly basis often for half cash. Which makes taxi drivers do anything for cash over recorded transactions. The whole system is crooked, even today.