4 ms·
This is ridiculous: "Look: the fact that they complained and talked with their users like any other company would do in this situation prove that they are guilt
by thiagoharry 3y ago
This is ridiculous: "Look: the fact that they complained and talked with their users like any other company would do in this situation prove that they are guilty". Do you think that Facebook would not lobby if it were being banned? You are also dismissing the users intelligence calling that they "are being manipulated" just because they are upset because they may lost access to the social media that they like. This new McCarthysm in USA looks ridiculous here from outside.
- Atotalnoob 3y agoBut it’s not a ban…
- thiagoharry 3y agoEFF replied this in their page: "A forced sale based on objections to content acts as a backdoor attempt to control speech". Saying that it is not a ban is just a way to find an excuse so that the government can accomplish indirectly (forcing the sale so that it tries to get rid of unwanted content) what it cannot do directly (just directly censor the content).