3 ms·
First option makes no sense. It requires a likely expensive dealmaking process with another company, like in your example do the endusers automatically get a fr
by advael 3y ago
First option makes no sense. It requires a likely expensive dealmaking process with another company, like in your example do the endusers automatically get a free permanent netflix sub to access the content? It's just not workable, and we see that in what should be the obvious case where it should be: Acquisitions. Another recent example of this fuckery was the funimation acquisition by crunchyroll, wherein "bought" content was rendered permanently inaccessible despite users' existing subscriptions rolling over to the new owner. Content licensing to stream is clearly a nightmare
Second option is the best, but obviates the whole purpose of the DRM. Without the DRM, it's basically the bandcamp model, which works great so I'm all for it
Third option is viable too maybe, but increases distribution costs so it's not a perfect replacement (it's also basically the bandcamp model, as buying physical from them also gives a digital download and streaming access)