2 ms·
Well, he delivered.
by moralestapia 3y ago
Well, he delivered.
- paxys 3y agoPartially. Open weights is not open source.
- xcv123 3y agoThe architecture of the model is open source. Not just the weights. You can run the entire thing locally.
- gfodor 3y agoIn machine learning models the term open source has been largely accepted to mean sharing weights and, if necessary, inference code. You can argue if this is an abuse of the term but everyone does it, and saying someone didn’t deliver if they used it and published weights would probably mean saying the same about mistral, meta, etc.
- asadotzler 3y agoYes. So say the same thing about them Open source has a definition and abusing that hurts all of us except the billionaires.
- moralestapia 3y agoI get the "open source" argument, but what is the issue here? If you are able to reproduce the thing in its entirety and you're given no restrictions on its use, it seems compatible with the spirit of open sourcing things.