2 ms·
>so perhaps the “electrolysis” was less chemical and more biological. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biorock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biorock
by gs17 3y ago
>so perhaps the “electrolysis” was less chemical and more biological.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biorock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biorock it's chemical:
> The chemical process that takes place on the cathode is as follows: Calcium carbonate (aragonite) combines with magnesium, chloride and hydroxyl ions to slowly accrete around the cathode coating it with a thick layer of material similar in composition to magnesium oxychloride cement. Over time cathodic protection replaces the negative chloride ion (Cl-) with dissolved bicarbonate (HCO3-) to harden the coating to a hydromagnesite-aragonite mixture with gaseous oxygen evolving through the porous structure.
But it does seem the process creates an environment that's very beneficial for coral growth in general.
- hinkley 3y agoThat’s what he claimed but I don’t think he updated his research. Which is why I said “more recently”