3 ms·
I want to research this route more but the camera is an important component to me. I suspect their is a model of phone from 5-10 years ago that has a an under-t
by dleink 3y ago
I want to research this route more but the camera is an important component to me. I suspect their is a model of phone from 5-10 years ago that has a an under-the-radar stellar camera and I would find "perfectly adequate". ("perfectly adequate" is my favored state for most tech solutions.)
- eric__cartman 3y agoYeah the camera is the only feature that would really make me want to switch phones. In my case it's more about being a broke CS student without a job lol. But the low-end device thing still stands. At least here in Argentina where I live most people can't buy a $1000+ phone without going into debt or saving money for a stupid amount of time to get it. Some people that really can't afford to do so still buy them though. Maybe it is reasonable for some but I never saw any appeal in spending so much money (comparatively to a monthly salary) on a non necessity. I happily spent that kind of money on a PC to use for work/study, but a phone? Nah.
- dleink 3y agoSame! The camera is the only part of the phone I want to spend real money on. Beyond personal preferences, I live and work in an area of California where people could greatly benefit from easily accessible phones so I'm interested in what's possible.
- ragall 3y agoThe Huawei P10+, released in 2017, has very good Leica optics, on par with much newer iPhone or Galaxy devices. https://www.gsmarena.com/huawei_p10_plus-8515.php https://www.gsmarena.com/huawei_p10_plus-8515.php