How does regulatory capture factor into this? This article is primarily about historical wages but does touch on wealth: > If real per capita GDP goes to $10 m

How does regulatory capture factor into this? This article is primarily about historical wages but does touch on wealth: > If real per capita GDP goes to $10 million (in 2024 dollars), rich people aren’t going to think twice about shelling out $300 for a haircut or $2,000 for a doctor’s appointment. So wherever humans’ comparative advantage does happen to lie, it’s likely that in a society made super-rich by AI, it’ll be pretty well-paid. The first chart of historical wealth trends shows the opposite: https://usafacts.org/articles/how-has-wealth-distribution-in-the-us-changed-over-time/ https://usafacts.org/articles/how-has-wealth-distribution-in... Will there be enough "rich people [that] aren’t going to think twice about shelling out $300 for a haircut" to bouy wages and wealth? That sounds like trickle down economics which has not been found to work that well (or so I have heard.)