3 ms·
I've no idea the point you're trying to make - almost all your links are regarding individual incidents of violence, I'm talking about state violence against pr
by komali2 3y ago
I've no idea the point you're trying to make - almost all your links are regarding individual incidents of violence, I'm talking about state violence against protesters in general. It's ironic you chose the capitol insurrection as an example - if that had been antifascists, the cops likely wouldn't have colluded to let them in, and there probably would have been far more violence, considering how they normally treat leftist protestors.
Don't you find it odd that the people with a hanged effigy of the vice president outside the capitol were able to ransack congressional halls with only four dead as a result?
- hotdogscout 3y agoI know there's collusion between some police departments and far right protestors in the US, this is obvious. I say some because there are exceptions. But your point was "there's no problem [protesting for the right]" and there is, there obviously is. They range from death at the hands of far left killers, persecution at work/academia, unemployment. It's absurd to pretend the right has no stake when protesting as you implied. >individual incidents of violence So it's a coincidence the killers were ideologically opposed to the victims? I don't get how "individual" these deaths are when there's a clear political motivation. Death of ideological enemies by "civilians" is how fascism in Italy began. Civilian political violence is not irrelevant.