I agree that LLM can be used as a tool by non-native English speakers. But the examples cited in the article are indefensible. The authors of the paper we eith

I agree that LLM can be used as a tool by non-native English speakers. But the examples cited in the article are indefensible. The authors of the paper we either so care less they did not notice the the “certainly, here is…” preamble made no sense in a paper. Or they have such a poor grasp of English that they are unable to comprehend what they copy-pasted to notice. Either way this suggests that nothing in the paper can be relied upon.