3 ms·
Yeah, I think that's one of the driving forces away from high code coverage / dogmatic TDD: dynamically typed languages used to be a lot more popular, and you r
by reissbaker 3y ago
Yeah, I think that's one of the driving forces away from high code coverage / dogmatic TDD: dynamically typed languages used to be a lot more popular, and you really do need incredible amounts of testing to keep those working reliably in the long run. Now that typed languages are more popular — while some of the tricky logic parts are still worth testing — you can wipe out a lot of the rest because it simply won't compile when, say, you passed a nullable variable to a function that didn't expect it.