Yes exactly the whole claim is fundamentally flawed. Better queries would include proper timeframing and all LLM-preference-tuning phrases from https://github.

Yes exactly the whole claim is fundamentally flawed. Better queries would include proper timeframing and all LLM-preference-tuning phrases from https://github.com/AlpinDale/gptslop https://github.com/AlpinDale/gptslop But even then, I don't think this is the gotcha OP thinks it is: LLM generation and summarizing is a legit tool in the paper writing process, especially for conclusions. In my academic experience, the paper introduction and conclusion is often written last-minute, close to the submission deadline. While a good intro and conclusion are important for the reader, very little time is made available for it since researchers spend maximal time on expanding material findings and experiments. No wonder that assistive writing tools are used to speed things up. As long as proper post-editing and proof-reading is applied.