> It sounds like it would have been legal if they were just more specific about the why? Maybe (probably?). Court didn't address the merit of the ban, it was i

> It sounds like it would have been legal if they were just more specific about the why? Maybe (probably?). Court didn't address the merit of the ban, it was impossible to do so, because FB didn't explain their reason. That latter part is ruled illegal, they need to explain (even if they're right) and provide meaningful way to contest (a human with power to make the decision, i.e. not an address that a bot always replies a LLM-generated rejection).