4 ms·
FYI, Ubuntu is a heavily advertised distro. Its pretty bottom barrel for quality. If you want a modern linux distro, try Fedora Cinnamon or something that isnt
by resource_waste 3y ago
FYI, Ubuntu is a heavily advertised distro. Its pretty bottom barrel for quality.
If you want a modern linux distro, try Fedora Cinnamon or something that isnt on Debian branch.
- throwaway2037 3y agoIt is not surprising that you posted this flame bait from a throwaway account. What is wrong with Debian?
- resource_waste 3y ago[flagged]
- lupusreal 3y agoDebian Sid makes a better desktop distro than Ubuntu. The drivers are up to date, the instability is greatly exaggerated and installing nonfree codecs is easy (so easy with virtually any distro that it shouldn't even enter into the equation...) This said, I prefer OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, which is rolling release yet more stable than Sid. Rolling release + extensive testing + automatic snapshotting gets you the best of all worlds.
- medstrom 3y agoBruh. I use Debian and Arch interchangeably, barely notice the difference.
- walteweiss 3y agoYeah, that’s why when I update my Arch MacBook Air once a year or two it works well, but Debian dies and needs to reinstall for some unknown reason. Before that, I believed Debian is so very stable. My experience shows the opposite.
- sgarland 3y agoIt is _stable_, not outdated. You are practically guaranteed that if you’re running Debian Stable, and live only within the official apt ecosystem, you will not have software-based instability.
- resource_waste 3y agoGrandma doesn't care about this. They just want their screen to work.