4 ms·
Why not just use `httpx`? If you're not bound to the stdlib, it's a great alternative to `requests` and url parse
by bormaj 3y ago
Why not just use `httpx`? If you're not bound to the stdlib, it's a great alternative to `requests` and url parse
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- kmike84 3y agoThe URL parsing in httpx is rfc3986, which is not the same as WHATWG URL living standard. rfc3986 may reject URLs which browsers accept, or it can handle them in a different way. WHATWG URL living standard tries to put on paper the real browser behavior, so it's a much better standard if you need to parse URLs extracted from real-world web pages.
- gjvc 3y agohttpx is great, and "needs to be in base"