> you're not making any claim other than imagining I claimed articles where the journalist doesn't know anything about the topic are always good. I definitely

> you're not making any claim other than imagining I claimed articles where the journalist doesn't know anything about the topic are always good. I definitely never argued or even believed any such thing. I started off in this (granted, rather silly) thread with a lukewarm defense of Hossenfelder, then you took a weird tangent on it and I disagreed with your framing (or what I could grok of it). Maybe you have me confused with someone else?