What's actually happened in practice: A huge number of politicians became entangled in SBF's operation, and the direct attacks made to date could be construed a

What's actually happened in practice: A huge number of politicians became entangled in SBF's operation, and the direct attacks made to date could be construed as attempts to get in at lower prices or control local onramps. Government officials that seek crypto bans end up with conflicts of interest. This is a recurring theme across the various countries that have announced such things. They don't deploy the secret taxpayer dollars to combat it, because they quickly get an angry phone call from a so-and-so on the inside. The superpower system works within an imaginary of imperial expansion, where everyone's motives converge on putting more assets on their balance sheet even if it means lying about how the books got that way. During the rise of the modern nations that meant supporting a stronger state and a bigger bureaucracy. If we define the quality of the accounting at scale as the goal, then blockchains are just a next progression in technology. That's still compatible with governance and power-seeking, it just changes the landscape of power in a way that shifts around the motives. The number of middlemen involved isn't zero, it doesn't stop corrupt dealing, but it has some substance, particularly in the largest scale of international finance, where you really can't "look to an authority".