3 ms·
@dang we o.k. w/ ad hominem at HN now?
by lif 3y ago
@dang we o.k. w/ ad hominem at HN now?
- snakeyjake 3y agoThis isn’t ad hominem. I read every single thing they ever posted to HN (in context) before making that, quite frankly generous, assertion.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- declan_roberts 3y agoI'm flattered! Although I will respectfully agree to disagree with your summary judgement against me.