2 ms·
The implication is we don't live in a peaceful society. Violent coercion is just disguised as men in suits writing contracts that are economically infeasible to
by salawat 3y ago
The implication is we don't live in a peaceful society. Violent coercion is just disguised as men in suits writing contracts that are economically infeasible to challenge backed up by skewed access to the State's means of physical violence.
In many ways, one could make the argument, a world where everyone is on an equal footing to do violence is preferable to one in which it is restricted to only a few.
- djohnston 3y agoThat’s just anarchy. If you want to live in anarchy, go to Haiti or something. Everyone has the means to commit violence. On your way you’ll notice a lot of people headed in the opposite direction. Turns out anarchy sucks way more than our capitalist democracy.
- derelicta 3y ago"Tell me you are clueless about what anarchism is without telling you are clueless about it is"