3 ms·

I'd say cyclic universe is way more kooky - it's wishful thinking that doesn't match the observations. https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/no-universe-befo

by exe34 3y ago

I'd say cyclic universe is way more kooky - it's wishful thinking that doesn't match the observations. https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/no-universe-before-big-bang/ https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/no-universe-before-b... This one is trying to replace one of the invisible mass with a modified physics.

magicalhippo 3y ago
That was my intuition, but I'm just a layman so... that said, both seem to be geared towards making testable predictions, which makes them both a lot better than some other proposed alternatives.