Full paper here[1], and here's[2] the earlier paper about the model itself. They overloaded the CCC acronym, which has also been used for Penrose's Conformal c

Full paper here[1], and here's[2] the earlier paper about the model itself. They overloaded the CCC acronym, which has also been used for Penrose's Conformal cyclic cosmology[3], though can't say which is more speculative. I'm also reminded of Von Neumann's elephant[4], given that they vary the constants it doesn't seem that surprising I suppose that they can get a fit. Freeman Dyson learned this the hard way[5]. This is just one test, the article mentions a few others that they'll need to pass to be a serious contender. Will be interesting to see how it goes. [1]: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc6 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc6 [2]: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/524/3/3385/7221343?login=false https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/524/3/3385/7221343?lo... [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_cyclic_cosmology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_cyclic_cosmology [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann%27s_elephant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann%27s_elephant [5]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV41QEKiMlM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV41QEKiMlM