No. Peer review is an established process in which the editor chooses usually two to four expert peers who review the paper. It is double blinded to reduce bias

No. Peer review is an established process in which the editor chooses usually two to four expert peers who review the paper. It is double blinded to reduce bias. It is also not the point of peer review to judge the correctness of the theory. Reviewers check relevance, novelty, plausibility, consistency, overall correctness of methodology. "I think this is wrong" is not something an editor would accept as an argument not to publish. That's something you can write in a new paper. And I don't think Hossenfelder would like to see it not published just because she thinks it's wrong.