Skyscrapers not being indigenous has no bearing on whether they should be built or not. I think we all agree on that. Here's what's really bothering me. How d

Skyscrapers not being indigenous has no bearing on whether they should be built or not. I think we all agree on that. Here's what's really bothering me. How did you arrive at the conclusion that the quote is implication of opposition to this development? Aside from the author of the article not so subtly injecting that implication, with no context, there's literally nothing to indicate that.