20 ms·
Did that narrative ever start? Wouldn't be bad but what's the contribution to the total? [EDIT] Reduced sulfur emissions leading to less cloud cover and theref
by quantified 3y ago
Did that narrative ever start? Wouldn't be bad but what's the contribution to the total?
[EDIT] Reduced sulfur emissions leading to less cloud cover and therefore more solar absorption is mentioned in the article, but let's face it: if less pollution makes things worse, things are truly bad. Somehow I understood that sulfur emissions also had their own GHG impact too.
- taeric 3y agohttps://www.science.org/content/article/changing-clouds-unforeseen-test-geoengineering-fueling-record-ocean-warmth https://www.science.org/content/article/changing-clouds-unfo... is what I vaguely remember. Haven't heard anything new on it. Edit: Saw your edit rather late. Apologies. I am not clear on your point? I'm asking specifically if this has been further quantified? I don't think it would change how dire the situation is. It may open up reasons for us to lean more into doing some stuff on purpose?