3 ms·
But listening to a paper passively is the not the same thing as being mentally prepared to converse with an LLM about a dense topic. I feel the usecases are qui
by 3abiton 3y ago
But listening to a paper passively is the not the same thing as being mentally prepared to converse with an LLM about a dense topic. I feel the usecases are quite different, and I doubt that there is a middle ground between listening passively and learning a complex topic. But maybe I am missing something.
- chaxor 3y agoThis is a bit different than the "read a paper" TTS app. I mentioned the idea just to say it's possible and coming. The blend of the two isn't out of the question though. Think of asking for a reading of a paper wherein you could interject at any time. System: "This work is presented fromainly 3 groups: Deepmind, University of Pennsylvania, and ETH Zurich - the authors are Matthew Botvinick, Dani Bassett, and Bastian Rieck. They uncover a useful meta-learning program that relies on an AT methodology rooted in the bifiltration of the Ricci curvature of the embeddings and training step, wherein ..." You: "Wait a second - the algebraic topology method - what are the prior works in that area and why would that be the starting point for this paper" System: "It appears that the relevant citations point to Anne Sizemore's work while in Bassett's lab, with a few other key authors such as Guisti. The titles suggest that..." (...) System: "Now that we've cleared that up a bit (and added it to a research list for further exploration later), to continue on the paper ..." And so on. This is very achievable today with a little bit of work. Perhaps not easy to work _super well_ - but likely easy enough to get working to _some degree_. A well polished product that does work super well certajnly isn't out of the question though.
- bredren 3y agoHow much would this product be worth to you?