2 ms·
The sentence that you snarkily attempted a grammatical correction on, does not contain a grammatical mistake. Considering the text of your comments contained in
by TeaBrain 3y ago
The sentence that you snarkily attempted a grammatical correction on, does not contain a grammatical mistake. Considering the text of your comments contained in this exchange, with the sparse attempts at employing correct grammar, I'd recommend against attempts at grammatical correction like this in the future.
Since it is not clear that English is your first language due to your poor grasp of my comment, the sentence in question contains "it" in reference to the circumstance of the death, as an object of the verb "believed", not the person of Epstein. The phrase "it was murder" is a complement to the verb "believed", meaning that subject of "Democrats, Independents and Republicans", had an belief that what occurred (it) was murder.
Also, the percentages I mentioned, which were cited in the linked page, do not represent the split along political lines, but represent a separate percentage for each, as I said. Since you also don't seem to recall elementary arithmetic, 40% + 32% + 33% = 105%, not 100%.
- georgespencer 3y ago> attempted a grammatical correction on Very relaxed about informal grammar, the point is that this: "Certus found that of those who believed Epstein to be murdered…" is materially different to "Certus found that of those who identify as [political party]…" You didn't repeat the numbers and I didn't check, so I'll take you at your word that this is not the segmentation Certus meant :) (See how easy it is to change your perspective to accommodate reality?!)