3 ms·

> Might be http://witch.valdikss.org.ru/ http://witch.valdikss.org.ru/ I think so! It looks slightly different than how I remember it but same elements in ther

• Izkata 3y ago
  > No OpenVPN detected. Looks like Mullvad is clear. Also in case anyone was curious about the name and image, I haven't thought about this series in forever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.I.T.C.H._(TV_series) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.I.T.C.H._(TV_series)
  • sunsay 3y ago
    >OpenVPN detected. Not for me. It detected Mulvad
    • wraptile 3y ago
      ProtonVPN passes too which is funny because I'm solving so many captchas I could power an entire captcha solving saas all by myself. So I'm not entirely convinced by this method.
      • Zenul_Abidin 3y ago
        That's because most sites serve you a captcha based on your IP address and ASN.
    • nichch 3y ago
      Mullvad uses both OpenVPN and Wireguard
      • dishsoap 3y ago
        And the site seems to tend to detect mullvad's wireguard as 'openvpn' while mullvad's openvpn is undetected by it. Perhaps that's what the parent is referring to.
        • Izkata 3y ago
          That would make sense because it didn't detect Mullvad's openvpn for me.
• topato 3y ago
  All Vypr obfuscation options pass. I'm surprised more people don't use VyprVPN, but then again, it's professional options are limited. I.e. surfshark's ability to choose specific data centers and IPs.But I bought 5 years of Vypr for like 50 bucks 3 years ago, so I'm pretty invested Edit: I forgot I use VyprVPN because of it's verified no-log, does anyone else know of a better service with verified history of denying log access / having active subpoena dead man's switch notices?
  • Zenul_Abidin 3y ago
    ExpressVPN but they sold out to shady folks a few years ago.
• anjel 3y ago
  windscribe/wireguard not detected