4 ms·

Might be http://witch.valdikss.org.ru/ http://witch.valdikss.org.ru/ , e.g., using number of flows and MTU (and maybe other techniques)

• tamimio 3y ago
  > Might be http://witch.valdikss.org.ru/ http://witch.valdikss.org.ru/ I think so! It looks slightly different than how I remember it but same elements in there, thanks for sharing it.
  • Izkata 3y ago
    > No OpenVPN detected. Looks like Mullvad is clear. Also in case anyone was curious about the name and image, I haven't thought about this series in forever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.I.T.C.H._(TV_series) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.I.T.C.H._(TV_series)
    • sunsay 3y ago
      >OpenVPN detected. Not for me. It detected Mulvad
      • wraptile 3y ago
        ProtonVPN passes too which is funny because I'm solving so many captchas I could power an entire captcha solving saas all by myself. So I'm not entirely convinced by this method.
        • Zenul_Abidin 3y ago
          That's because most sites serve you a captcha based on your IP address and ASN.
      • nichch 3y ago
        Mullvad uses both OpenVPN and Wireguard
        • dishsoap 3y ago
          And the site seems to tend to detect mullvad's wireguard as 'openvpn' while mullvad's openvpn is undetected by it. Perhaps that's what the parent is referring to.
          • Izkata 3y ago
            That would make sense because it didn't detect Mullvad's openvpn for me.
  • topato 3y ago
    All Vypr obfuscation options pass. I'm surprised more people don't use VyprVPN, but then again, it's professional options are limited. I.e. surfshark's ability to choose specific data centers and IPs.But I bought 5 years of Vypr for like 50 bucks 3 years ago, so I'm pretty invested Edit: I forgot I use VyprVPN because of it's verified no-log, does anyone else know of a better service with verified history of denying log access / having active subpoena dead man's switch notices?
    • Zenul_Abidin 3y ago
      ExpressVPN but they sold out to shady folks a few years ago.
  • anjel 3y ago
    windscribe/wireguard not detected
• username135 3y ago
  Pretty neat. Doesnt pick up Proton, which I guess is good.
• ogurechny 3y ago
  By the way, the author has a small forum with lots of updates on developments (and bugs) in large scale DPI systems. https://ntc.party https://ntc.party What governments use today for censorship and spying will tomorrow be a one-click solution for small businesses and script kiddies.
• ameyv 3y ago
  Kaspersky is flagging this website as HEUR:Exploit.Script.Generic;Trojan;High;Heuristic Analysis;http://witch.valdikss.org.ru http://witch.valdikss.org.ru; Expert analysis Pls be careful.
  • wut42 3y ago
    "Heuristic Analysis" kinda says it all. Antivirus like Kaspersky likes to block websites for whatever reason they like.
  • patrakov 3y ago
    That's because of this tag: <img src="file://witch.valdikss.org.ru/a" width=0 height=0> This is a part of the attempt that the site does to retrieve the NTLM hash of your Windows account password. See https://hackerone.com/reports/1054382 https://hackerone.com/reports/1054382 for more details.
• jtriangle 3y ago
  Surfshark wireguard not detected.