2 ms·
If I'm following OP's question, it was basically that all of this makes sense from a "people are doing what benefits them the most" POV. But some time went by
by TheGRS 3y ago
If I'm following OP's question, it was basically that all of this makes sense from a "people are doing what benefits them the most" POV.
But some time went by and it morphed into being overall bad for the McDonald's brand, and that's the puzzling part of it. You would think Micky D's would have power to step in and say "enough is a enough, this is hurting our image, quit fucking around and fix the machines or we find another vendor."
I would agree Micky D's corporate probably does have sway here, so this problem probably just isn't interesting or important enough for them to do anything about it. Maybe ice cream is such a small part of their sales they don't see the point in raising a stink about it. Or maybe the vendor just happened to Game of Thrones their way into a little niche of power that Ronald can't do anything about.
And for the size that they are, I find that pretty interesting and puzzling as well!
- autoexec 3y ago> If I'm following OP's question, it was basically that all of this makes sense from a "people are doing what benefits them the most" POV. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it makes sense, but it's no surprise that things break down when a bunch of people who should be working together each act selfishly. As you'd expect nobody really wins, but it's the little guy that gets screwed the worst. Customers don't get ice cream, employees deal with frustrated customers, franchise owners lose time and money, the shitty vendor gets worked around, and the corporation's image takes a hit for being the ringleader of this circus.