4 ms·
>Just because you don't like what irb has to offer doesn't mean you get to define what REPL is. If you did it 50 or 30 years ago, as Lisp has, you do get to de
by batista 14y ago
>Just because you don't like what irb has to offer doesn't mean you get to define what REPL is.
If you did it 50 or 30 years ago, as Lisp has, you do get to define what it is.
- irahul 14y ago> If you did it 50 or 30 years ago, as Lisp has, you do get to define what it is. And isn't the lisp definitions of repl the same as mine?