4 ms·
>20 years is as much a deterrent as 50 years, but at a lower cost to the tax payer. The number of wealthy people getting those kinds of sentences is basically
by throwaway74432 3y ago
>20 years is as much a deterrent as 50 years, but at a lower cost to the tax payer.
The number of wealthy people getting those kinds of sentences is basically 0, so the cost to the taxpayer is a moot point.
- anigbrowl 3y agobut let's say we had a habit of locking up corrupt billionaires for 20 years
- throwaway74432 3y agoThere's only about 3000 billionaires in the world. Again, cost is a moot point.