5 ms·
Only tangentially related, but I think the mid/late game is a much more interesting/useful/hard avenue for chess tools. Chess.com's opening explorer is pretty
by robrenaud 3y ago
Only tangentially related, but I think the mid/late game is a much more interesting/useful/hard avenue for chess tools.
Chess.com's opening explorer is pretty good, which it seems like this is kind of trying to compete against.
What I struggle with is the post game review, where I make a dubious move but I don't actually understand the reason why it's bad. Sure, the engine shows better moves and the refutation to my move, but I often don't know why. The automatically generated explanation is usually pretty poor.
I wish I had even a poor copy of Danya giving me commentary.
Perhaps I should just lean in and try to implement something like this, but focus it more on coaching than commentary.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08195.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08195.pdf
- jaryd 3y agoYou could check to see if one of his games has that position using https://fenfinder.com https://fenfinder.com (site I built). Of course it's a long shot given the huge possibility-space of unique positions, but hey, one can hope :).
- V-2 3y agoI think that AI, overhyped as it may be, will truly get to shine when it comes to this aspect of chess - basically, tutoring.