I'm skeptical of the impact this will have on homeowners, if you define homeowners as someone who owns the house in which they live. This comes at a time when

I'm skeptical of the impact this will have on homeowners, if you define homeowners as someone who owns the house in which they live. This comes at a time when residential property is increasingly being bought up by commercial interests, and it is interesting to note that, as per the linked article, this case was brought by a group of home sellers and not people looking to buy. While this change may benefit some people looking to buy their homes, I believe that most benefits will be reaped by commercial interests looking to rent the houses for profit.