3 ms·
An alternative interpretation of the comment you're responding to is that you can do the same things in R, so no reason to switch.
by bachmeier 3y ago
An alternative interpretation of the comment you're responding to is that you can do the same things in R, so no reason to switch.
- waveBidder 3y agojust because someone programmed something in R successfuly one time to compare against doesn't suddenly make it a better language.
- ngcc_hk 3y agoI suspect what is being said is to compare existing stat textbook but more likely existing stat result of a web site using r. Not to run r but run these and compare the result. I did the same to r using ibm spss. Not that I trust that more. Just to make sure when newly program you have used the right parameters. If they compare, you finish learning and switch over. A cautious approach when your job is at stake.
- bachmeier 3y agoThe entire point of my comment was that the initial commenter wasn't necessarily saying R is a better language. Somehow you've interpreted my comment as "R is a better language" which is quite far from what it says.