4 ms·
The article summary indicates that payment processing was affected. I'm not sure what possibilities there are for offline payment processing, but that's differe
by organsnyder 3y ago
The article summary indicates that payment processing was affected. I'm not sure what possibilities there are for offline payment processing, but that's different than just not being able to report sales numbers or something. And opening cash-only is probably not worth the hassle for many locations.
- dylan604 3y ago"Back in my day..." we had registers that held the money that customers exchanged for the goods. Servers could write down orders on small pad and hand it to the cooks. There were lots of ways to not close your business because the phone company wasn't working. The move to cashless society has many pros/cons, and this is just showing a glaring item from the cons list. You live by the sword, you die by the sword. Some of us prefer some shields and armor though Edit: it's so ancient that even I nearly forgot about them, but credit cards used to work by having the company take an impression of the card, then send in the receipts. sure, it might take a few days for transactions to complete, but it worked for several decades. there are fallbacks available to us, if we would just decide to allow for it rather than just failing
- edmundsauto 3y agoShields and armor are dirty, heavy, and tend to get stolen. And people can’t overspend so ticket totals are lower. As with most decisions this one is a series of tradeoffs. Appreciate the reminisce and the fun metaphor though!
- dylan604 3y agoYou can't get any lower than none because you're too dependent on some digital service to accept a payment. At least accepting cash is > 0. So your point is lacking.