I'm wondering if you were talking to someone else but I can't figure out who. My question was pretty simple. How are you guys (commenters) drawing a connectio

I'm wondering if you were talking to someone else but I can't figure out who. My question was pretty simple. How are you guys (commenters) drawing a connection between what the author quoted, and the assumption that the person being quoted opposes the building project? What context are you using to correlate those? Here's a logic diagram to help. Assume P1 is true, since that's what he's saying: P1: indigenous lifestyle is not skyscrapers. P2: skyscrapers can be built by indigenous people. C: indigenous people can't build skyscrapers The above is nonsensical. Your conclusion is in direct opposition to the premise. Introducing this person's quote to the article was totally irrelevant unless you're aware of some context that is missing from the story.